When the law can’t be enforced: The case of the chinese immigrants who’re not getting their immigration court case heard

In the US, immigration courts are a powerful tool for immigrants seeking to secure their asylum claims, but they are often run by private lawyers and have long been plagued by problems.

Now the Federal Government is moving to change that.

It has signed a law to change the way that the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) can be enforced.

It is designed to address the issue of foreign-born lawyers who are being unable to access the court system because of financial and legal problems, or the inability to obtain visas to come to the US.

It will also help prevent other legal challenges by foreign nationals to their asylum applications, as well as the challenges of legal challenges for immigrants to enter the country.

“The current system does not make sense for the millions of legal residents of the United States who rely on it to seek their asylum,” Immigration Minister Peter Dutton said.

“In my view, we need to give the court the ability to be more efficient and accountable.”

The change to the Immigration Act, which was introduced last year, will require that if an immigrant or other foreign national who is not an Australian citizen applies for a visa to come here, they will be required to provide evidence of their eligibility for legal permanent residence.

It also makes changes to the rules governing when an application can be lodged and when an immigration judge will decide on the application.

“As a result, if the applicant is not qualified to come and is not in compliance with the requirements of the visa, then the application will not be processed and they will not have their claim processed,” Immigration and Citizenship Minister Peter dutton said in a statement.

The changes are aimed at encouraging more foreign-based lawyers to come into the court and challenge immigration cases in a timely manner, as they do for asylum seekers.

But they are likely to cause concern among immigration lawyers who have been struggling to get their cases heard.

“We have lawyers from all over the world, and they’re not all in a good place to do their work,” said James McGlone, a senior counsel with the Australian Immigration Lawyers Association.

“And what we’ve seen is that people who are applying for visas, we see them coming in, and we know they have a visa, and then they’re never heard.”

Mr McGlones said he could not see the Government changing the way it does things, as it was unlikely that they would be able to achieve its stated goal.

“This is going to be a challenge for the Government to get a handle on it,” he said.

The changes have been welcomed by the Australian Bar Association, which has warned that the changes would lead to more cases being rejected, which would be a problem for asylum-seekers.

The Australian Refugee Council, which represents asylum seekers in Australia, said it was “extremely concerned” by the changes.

“Any change to immigration law would be extremely disruptive and would be particularly detrimental to asylum seekers who are already facing enormous financial and social burdens,” it said.